Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 06:18

Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Adam Silver Talks NBA Expansion - Blazer's Edge
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Tetris 99 47th MAXIMUS CUP – News – Nintendo Official Site - Nintendo
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Dolorem suscipit perferendis ea aut quo et ea.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Some in Steelers Building Wanted to Go Back to Justin Fields in 2024 - Sports Illustrated
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Saquon Barkley unveiled as ‘Madden NFL 26’ cover star with famous backwards hurdle - New York Post